[zeromq-dev] Alternatives to rfc.zeromq.org

Trevor Bernard trevor.bernard at gmail.com
Sun Nov 26 14:41:48 CET 2023


> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.

The RFC repository follows the C4 process. Maintainers aren't supposed
to pass value judgments on correct patches. If they disagree they
should follow up with their own patches.

On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 8:33 AM Justus Ranvier <justusranvier at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you. Hugo looks like a really great tool.
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:52 AM Kevin Sapper <kevinsapper88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justus,
>> it's build with hugo and hosted on Netlify.
>>
>> //Kevin
>>
>> Justus Ranvier <justusranvier at gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 25. Nov. 2023, 03:15:
>>>
>>> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.
>>>
>>> Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list