[zeromq-dev] [zeromq-announce] When is new version of libzmq getting released?

[Gaurav Gupta]

For my use, a heartbeat version change would be good enough as long as it
includes all the changes made on top of the last release and it is stable.

@bluca, can you please clarify how the versions would be incorrect? I agree
whitespace changes should be taken care of

Regards,
Gaurav

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 8:30 PM John Goetz <j.goetz at tecplot.com> wrote:

> I made a rough attempt at a PR, bumping the version to 4.4.0 which seemed
> a reasonable increment considering the volume of code changes over the past
> 2+ years:
>
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/4550
>
> which was promptly closed as "not helpful" by @bluca. Unfortunately, it
> looks like he does not read this email list. I'm not sure, but those in
> this email thread may want to make another attempt or try to revive my
> now-dead PR.
>
> This is @bluca's (https://github.com/bluca) closing comment:
>
> "This is not useful. Apart from getting the versions wrong, and apart from
> the mess with whitespace changes, dumping git log into NEWS doesn't help,
> it needs to be curated. If you want to help, you can do manual QA on
> Windows/OSX/QNX/Solaris/BSD* and so on."
>
> I had asked about the release schedule here and on gitter in January 2023
> which was met with near silence.
>
> Also, I'm under the impression that the master branch is to be considered
> stable, so I'm not sure what he meant by "manual QA". All we're looking for
> is a heartbeat version change, right?
> - John Goetz
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20230519/aa4fe017/attachment.htm>