[zeromq-dev] [zeromq-announce] When is new version of libzmq getting released?
Harald Achitz
harald.achitz at gmail.com
Sun Aug 6 22:05:08 CEST 2023
Hi,
Is there any progress or information about getting a new release?
Since the re-licensing has been done, and zmq_proxy_steerable is now
deprecated, I think everything should be ready. Not?
Regards,
Harald
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 09:11, Gaurav Gupta <eng.gupta26 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Just checking again when the new version is going to be released.
>
> Someone tried to bump the version to R4.4.0 ( https://github.com/zeromq
> /libzmq/pull/4550 ) but the issue was closed before changes could be
> merged.
>
> Kindly confirm
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:54 PM Francesco <francesco.montorsi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Let me add myself (and actually the company I work for) as a +1 voters
>> for a new release.
>> We're using libzmq in production since several years and we're rebuilding
>> it in our CI/CD from a specific master version of ~1yr ago. Still having a
>> version 4.3.5 would be really good to clearly mark the point in time and
>> communicate everyone that...well...the project is not dead! :)
>>
>> If some help is needed to get the release done I think I can volunteer to
>> help...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>>
>> Il lun 15 mag 2023, 17:09 Bill Torpey <wallstprog at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> FWIW, in my shop procedures to release code into prod are very strict,
>>> and versioning is a key part of that. A single release consists of a dozen
>>> or so component packages — some of these are open-source project hosted by
>>> others (e.g., https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq
>>> <https://github.com/nyfix/libzmq>), some are open-source projects that
>>> we host ourselves (e.g., https://github.com/nyfix/OZ), and some are
>>> internal closed-source projects.
>>>
>>> In order to build the open-source components, both our own and others’,
>>> we need to create a “parent” project that provides the required tooling,
>>> boilerplate, etc. for our internal build process, and then pull in the
>>> open-source “core” (e.g., using git submodules). For open-source projects
>>> that we don’t host ourselves, the submodule points to a fork that can
>>> contain commits that are essential to us, but for one reason or another
>>> have not (yet) been accepted upstream.
>>>
>>> As you can imagine, this is all a major PITA. Anything that makes this
>>> process easier to track and audit is helpful.
>>>
>>> I’ll also add that not having defined releases is a major impediment to
>>> incorporating ZeroMQ (or any other project) in a typical corporate
>>> environment.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 15, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Gaurav Gupta <eng.gupta26 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks to all for sharing their inputs.
>>>
>>> I would agree that it's time to create a new version. And 320 commits is
>>> not a small number, even if there is no significant feature in those 320
>>> commits.
>>>
>>> Would request the team to please release a new version
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gaurav
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 8:03 PM Matthias Gabriel <
>>> matthias.gabriel at etit.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, there was a typo:
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it helps turning the question around: what keeps us from
>>>> releasinf the next version (point release). If nobody has a good argument
>>>> then it's time, I'd say :)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20230806/81c27068/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list