[zeromq-dev] steerable proxy performance impact (zmqcpp)
Ernest Zed
kreuzerkrieg at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 01:48:08 CET 2018
Dont think this question is relevant anymore, everything boiled down to
socket performance. Meanwhile I'll ask another question. In case the proxy
will be an issue I'll get back to it.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:06 PM Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:
> Which binding are you using?
> Can you link to the steerable proxy in question?
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:36 AM Ernest Zed <kreuzerkrieg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm running performance tests on our system and I see that our server
>> side which uses back/front end sockets consumes much of the CPU time in the
>> steerable proxy. Once I switch to regular proxy, things look better. Is
>> steerable proxy known as performance bottleneck/big cpu consumer?
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20181128/2600c6cf/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list