[zeromq-dev] steerable proxy performance impact (zmqcpp)

Doron Somech somdoron at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 11:04:15 CET 2018

Which binding are you using?
Can you link to the steerable proxy in question?

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:36 AM Ernest Zed <kreuzerkrieg at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running performance tests on our system and I see that our server side
> which uses back/front end sockets consumes much of the CPU time in the
> steerable proxy. Once I switch to regular proxy, things look better. Is
> steerable proxy known as performance bottleneck/big cpu consumer?
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20181126/ab3baa30/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list