[zeromq-dev] Call for testing for libzmq 4.2.3

Francesco francesco.montorsi at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 19:12:49 CET 2017


Hi Luca,
This is just to let you know that so far I've been testing libzmq master in
a software that uses a lot of PUB/SUB and REQ/REP sockets and I did not
find any issue at all.

HTH,
Francesco



2017-11-24 16:43 GMT+01:00 Francesco <francesco.montorsi at gmail.com>:

> Hi Luca,
> I investigated a little more this issue today and I spotted that it was a
> false alarm.
> Long story short: for several reasons I need to store shared libraries in
> a specific place (not inside Linux standard folders); to ensure my binaries
> can find the shared libraries I inject into libzmq the GCC -Xlinker -rpath
> /my/path option. The result is that regardless of libtool automagic
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH adjustments the tests were running against the outdated
> libzmq version inside /my/path. After updating /my/path/libzmq.so.5.1.3 the
> tests pass just fine, included test_req_relaxed.
>
> I will start testing libzmq in my company's bigger software next week and
> will let you know...
>
> Thanks,
> Francesco
>
>
>
> 2017-11-21 17:10 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>:
>
>> The closest I can get to that is on the Ubuntu 16.04 OBS build, where
>> the test passes:
>>
>> https://build.opensuse.org/build/network:messaging:zeromq:git-draft/xUb
>> untu_16.04/x86_64/libzmq/_log
>>
>> Ubuntu 16.04, gcc 5.3.1, libc 2.23, libstdc++ 5.3.1 - not quite the
>> same, but couldn't see how it could affect that test :-/
>>
>> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 16:59 +0100, Francesco wrote:
>> > Hi Luca,
>> > The environment is:
>> >  - Ubuntu 16.04 (but I tested also on Centos 7 same result)
>> >  - gcc 5.3.0 compiled from sources with default options      (NOTE
>> > this is
>> > not gcc 5.5.0)
>> >  - glibc 2.22
>> >  - libstdc++.so.6.0.21
>> >
>> > Before update IIRC the tests were passing except for random failures
>> > of
>> > test_security_zap.
>> >
>> > Francesco
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-11-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for the report, unfortunately I can't repro with GCC 5.5
>> > > (the
>> > > closest I can get on Debian to 5.3). What's the full environment?
>> > > OS,
>> > > libc, libstdc++
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Francesco wrote:
>> > > > Hi Luca,
>> > > > I grabbed latest libzmq-master and rebuilt it with the GCC for
>> > > > our
>> > > > production software (gcc 5.3) and I always get the following test
>> > > > failure:
>> > > >
>> > > > ====================================
>> > > >    zeromq 4.2.3: ./test-suite.log
>> > > > ====================================
>> > > >
>> > > > # TOTAL: 90
>> > > > # PASS:  89
>> > > > # SKIP:  0
>> > > > # XFAIL: 0
>> > > > # FAIL:  1
>> > > > # XPASS: 0
>> > > > # ERROR: 0
>> > > >
>> > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2
>> > > >
>> > > > FAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
>> > > > ============================
>> > > >
>> > > > lt-test_req_relaxed: tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp:118: int main():
>> > > > Assertion
>> > > > `events == 2' failed.
>> > > > FAIL tests/test_req_relaxed (exit status: 134)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I will try to debug that in the next days as soon as I have some
>> > > > time...
>> > > > Btw I'm building WITHOUT libsodium  and with draft features
>> > > > turned
>> > > > on. I
>> > > > don't know if this makes any difference.
>> > > >
>> > > > Francesco
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2017-11-17 19:00 GMT+01:00 Brian Knox via zeromq-dev <
>> > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it later today
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > see if
>> > > > > anything breaks.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at g
>> > > > > mail
>> > > > > .com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 duct-taped
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > major
>> > > > > > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is gone. I am currently
>> > > > > > compiling
>> > > > > > the changelog.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It would be great if folks with applications using 4.2.2
>> > > > > > could
>> > > > > > test
>> > > > > > 4.2.3 and report any regressions that they eventually find.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Kind regards,
>> > > > > > Luca Boccassi_______________________________________________
>> > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Luca Boccassi
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>> Luca Boccassi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20171130/48cf6763/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list