[zeromq-dev] Call for testing for libzmq 4.2.3

brunobodin . brunobodin at gmail.com
Sat Nov 25 11:39:20 CET 2017


Hi Luca

I am also testing my application with zmq 4.2.3, which is mostly windows
appliciation. I still have some issues to investigate (for now I got caught
by the edtimeout => eagain change on zmq_poll_wait),
I will tell as soon as I know more.

Bruno

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Great, thank you!
>
> On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 16:43 +0100, Francesco wrote:
> > Hi Luca,
> > I investigated a little more this issue today and I spotted that it
> > was a
> > false alarm.
> > Long story short: for several reasons I need to store shared
> > libraries in a
> > specific place (not inside Linux standard folders); to ensure my
> > binaries
> > can find the shared libraries I inject into libzmq the GCC -Xlinker
> > -rpath
> > /my/path option. The result is that regardless of libtool automagic
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH adjustments the tests were running against the
> > outdated
> > libzmq version inside /my/path. After updating
> > /my/path/libzmq.so.5.1.3 the
> > tests pass just fine, included test_req_relaxed.
> >
> > I will start testing libzmq in my company's bigger software next week
> > and
> > will let you know...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Francesco
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-11-21 17:10 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > The closest I can get to that is on the Ubuntu 16.04 OBS build,
> > > where
> > > the test passes:
> > >
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/build/network:messaging:zeromq:git-draft
> > > /xUb
> > > untu_16.04/x86_64/libzmq/_log
> > >
> > > Ubuntu 16.04, gcc 5.3.1, libc 2.23, libstdc++ 5.3.1 - not quite the
> > > same, but couldn't see how it could affect that test :-/
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 16:59 +0100, Francesco wrote:
> > > > Hi Luca,
> > > > The environment is:
> > > >  - Ubuntu 16.04 (but I tested also on Centos 7 same result)
> > > >  - gcc 5.3.0 compiled from sources with default
> > > > options      (NOTE
> > > > this is
> > > > not gcc 5.5.0)
> > > >  - glibc 2.22
> > > >  - libstdc++.so.6.0.21
> > > >
> > > > Before update IIRC the tests were passing except for random
> > > > failures
> > > > of
> > > > test_security_zap.
> > > >
> > > > Francesco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2017-11-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the report, unfortunately I can't repro with GCC 5.5
> > > > > (the
> > > > > closest I can get on Debian to 5.3). What's the full
> > > > > environment?
> > > > > OS,
> > > > > libc, libstdc++
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Francesco wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Luca,
> > > > > > I grabbed latest libzmq-master and rebuilt it with the GCC
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > production software (gcc 5.3) and I always get the following
> > > > > > test
> > > > > > failure:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ====================================
> > > > > >    zeromq 4.2.3: ./test-suite.log
> > > > > > ====================================
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # TOTAL: 90
> > > > > > # PASS:  89
> > > > > > # SKIP:  0
> > > > > > # XFAIL: 0
> > > > > > # FAIL:  1
> > > > > > # XPASS: 0
> > > > > > # ERROR: 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
> > > > > > ============================
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lt-test_req_relaxed: tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp:118: int
> > > > > > main():
> > > > > > Assertion
> > > > > > `events == 2' failed.
> > > > > > FAIL tests/test_req_relaxed (exit status: 134)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will try to debug that in the next days as soon as I have
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > time...
> > > > > > Btw I'm building WITHOUT libsodium  and with draft features
> > > > > > turned
> > > > > > on. I
> > > > > > don't know if this makes any difference.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Francesco
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2017-11-17 19:00 GMT+01:00 Brian Knox via zeromq-dev <
> > > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it later
> > > > > > > today
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > see if
> > > > > > > anything breaks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccas
> > > > > > > si at g
> > > > > > > mail
> > > > > > > .com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 duct-
> > > > > > > > taped
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > major
> > > > > > > > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is gone. I am
> > > > > > > > currently
> > > > > > > > compiling
> > > > > > > > the changelog.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It would be great if folks with applications using 4.2.2
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > 4.2.3 and report any regressions that they eventually
> > > > > > > > find.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > Luca
> > > > > > > > Boccassi_______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Luca Boccassi
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Luca Boccassi
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20171125/2f02b130/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list