[zeromq-dev] Call for testing for libzmq 4.2.3

Francesco francesco.montorsi at gmail.com
Tue Nov 21 16:59:02 CET 2017


Hi Luca,
The environment is:
 - Ubuntu 16.04 (but I tested also on Centos 7 same result)
 - gcc 5.3.0 compiled from sources with default options      (NOTE this is
not gcc 5.5.0)
 - glibc 2.22
 - libstdc++.so.6.0.21

Before update IIRC the tests were passing except for random failures of
test_security_zap.

Francesco


2017-11-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>:

> Thanks for the report, unfortunately I can't repro with GCC 5.5 (the
> closest I can get on Debian to 5.3). What's the full environment? OS,
> libc, libstdc++
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Francesco wrote:
> > Hi Luca,
> > I grabbed latest libzmq-master and rebuilt it with the GCC for our
> > production software (gcc 5.3) and I always get the following test
> > failure:
> >
> > ====================================
> >    zeromq 4.2.3: ./test-suite.log
> > ====================================
> >
> > # TOTAL: 90
> > # PASS:  89
> > # SKIP:  0
> > # XFAIL: 0
> > # FAIL:  1
> > # XPASS: 0
> > # ERROR: 0
> >
> > .. contents:: :depth: 2
> >
> > FAIL: tests/test_req_relaxed
> > ============================
> >
> > lt-test_req_relaxed: tests/test_req_relaxed.cpp:118: int main():
> > Assertion
> > `events == 2' failed.
> > FAIL tests/test_req_relaxed (exit status: 134)
> >
> >
> > I will try to debug that in the next days as soon as I have some
> > time...
> > Btw I'm building WITHOUT libsodium  and with draft features turned
> > on. I
> > don't know if this makes any difference.
> >
> > Francesco
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-11-17 19:00 GMT+01:00 Brian Knox via zeromq-dev <
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it later today and
> > > see if
> > > anything breaks.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail
> > > .com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 duct-taped the
> > > > major
> > > > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is gone. I am currently
> > > > compiling
> > > > the changelog.
> > > >
> > > > It would be great if folks with applications using 4.2.2 could
> > > > test
> > > > 4.2.3 and report any regressions that they eventually find.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Luca Boccassi_______________________________________________
> > > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20171121/f78bb3a7/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list