[zeromq-dev] zyre and curve key exchange

[Wes Young]

ack, i’ve tested it both ways. figured i’d float the overloading idea since it’s a bit more concise, but could lead to confusion.

i’ll re-factor as an actor call (with the extra headers involved with server_connect, etc) and see how it looks (a bit more gsl hacking todo-). i don’t have a strong opinion either way, wva makes it easier to adopt.

as i was flipping through the various ways endpoints are used in _bind|_connect and i don’t think there’s an RFC for that(?). not that their needs to be, but the way PH has apparently brainwashed me over the years, was surprised there wasn’t. :)

> On Jul 15, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would recommend using actor calls rather than overloading.
> 
> The endpoint format is already very overloaded and a bit confusing as
> it is, having clear API calls is much cleaner and understandable for
> users and developers IMHO.

--
wes
wesyoung.me

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170715/a3ef17d7/attachment.sig>