[zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1?

[brunobodin .]

Kevin,

I would like to be able to leverage the change I did about the
zsys_interface variable (https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/pull/1602)
in a tagged release, but I am ok with Luca's answer and can wait for a
couple of weeks.

thanks for asking

Bruno

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Kevin Sapper <kevinsapper88 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> There changes to czmq since the last release are so minimal that it does
> not require a new release now IMO.
>
> @brunobodin: Is there a feature you like to use from czmq master?
>
>
> On So, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:45 , Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 08:48 +0100, brunobodin . wrote:
>
> Hi Luca Do you also plan to release a CZMQ version ? Regards Bruno
>
> Could do, but there's still a couple of issues with zbeacon + ipv6
> linklocal that I'd like to iron out before that. Don't want to tag the repo
> with a half-working implementation, even if it's draft. I'll have time to
> look at this shortly, so perhaps next week or the one after.
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>
> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 13:26 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On
> Fri, 2017-02-17 at 10:32 +0000, Simon.Giesecke at btc-ag.com > > wrote: > >
> > Hi, > > > > > > is it possible to do publish the bugfix release 4.2.2
> now? We > > > need > > > one quite urgently now. > > > > > > Thanks a lot >
> > > Simon > > > > Hi, > > > > There's a few fixes queued so sounds like a
> good time, I'll put > > together > > a changelog and push it over the
> weekend. > > > > Kind regards, > > Luca Boccassi > > 4.2.2 is out:
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/releases/tag/v4.2.2 > > > >
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Luca Boccassi [
> mailto:luca.boccassi at gmail.com <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>] > > > Gesendet:
> Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 12:41 > > > An: Giesecke, Simon > > > Cc:
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org > > > Betreff: Re: AW: [zeromq-dev] Behaviour
> change between 4.1.5 > > > and > > > 4.2.1? > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-01-30
> at 14:18 +0000, Simon.Giesecke at btc-ag.com > > > wrote: > > > > Hi again,
> > > > > > > > > I was now able to do a local test with the current HEAD of
> > > > > libzmq, which seems to fix the problem again. > > > > > > > > To do
> complete tests in our integration environment, I would > > > > require a
> release version. When is 4.2.2 going to be > > > > released? Is > > > > it
> possible to do this in the next days? > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > >
> Simon > > > > > > 4.2.1 was released not too long ago, so we could probably
> do > > > one > > > sometimes before mid February when there should be
> enough bug > > > fixes > > > queued up > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche
> Nachricht----- > > > > Von: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.boccassi at gmail.com
> <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>] > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2017
> 12:26 > > > > An: ZeroMQ development list > > > > Betreff: Re: [zeromq-dev]
> Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and > > > > 4.2.1? > > > > > > > > On Mon,
> 2017-01-16 at 10:32 +0000, Simon.Giesecke at btc-ag.com > > > > wrote: > > >
> > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > we have migrated from ZeroMQ 4.1.5 to 4.2.1
> recently and I > > > > > notice some behaviour change in some of our test
> cases. > > > > > These > > > > > cases are related to enforcing that some
> queues run full > > > > > resp. > > > > > the HWM is exceeded. Sorry I
> cannot be more precise at the > > > > > moment; I tried to reproduce the
> behavioural differences > > > > > with > > > > > some reduced code example,
> but have not been successful so > > > > > far. > > > > > To enable me to
> facilitate a more focused reproduction of > > > > > the > > > > > issue, I
> have a general question in advance. Have there > > > > > been > > > > > any
> deliberate changes in behaviour between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1 > > > > > that
> might be related to this? From reading the release > > > > > notes, > > > >
> > I did not find something that raised my attention. > > > > > > > > > >
> Best regards > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > One major change is that
> setting HWM works also after > > > > connecting/binding, is that what you
> are doing? > > > > > > > > There were many other bug fixes that can be seen
> in the git > > > > log, > > > > can't > > > > remember all of them off the
> top of my head > > > > > > > > Also what transport mode are you using? > >
> > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org > https://lists.zeromq.org/
> mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/
> mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170219/44fbae17/attachment.htm>