[zeromq-dev] Asyncronous clients

[Андрей Олейник]

Justin,

Identity determine socket. In my case it is DEALER socket which connects to
ROUTER sockets with the same identity.
DEALER wouldn't receive messages unless identity set correctly. So I think,
I'm using correct address.

The problem is that I don't know how to match request with response on the
same socket in case when order of responses is not defined.

Andrey

пн, 24 апр. 2017 г. в 21:54, Justin Karneges <justin at karneges.com>:

> Hi Andrey,
>
> ROUTER sockets read the first part of the message as the recipient
> address. Is it possible you're using the wrong address when sending?
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017, at 01:08 AM, Андрей Олейник wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a chat application that receives messages through WebSockets and
> processes them on workers connected by a DEALER-ROUTER pattern. Chat sends
> and receives ZMQ messages through one DEALER socket. It has been working
> until I added second worker (ROUTER socket). From now there is not guaranty
> that client will receive its own response.
>
> As I understand the solution could be to use separate DEALER socket for
> each WebSocket connection or use one socket with a wrapper that will handle
> sharing across WebSockets connections.
>
> What is the best way to have it done?
>
> Thank you,
> Andrey
>
> *_______________________________________________*
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170424/d5d1111b/attachment.htm>