[zeromq-dev] czmqjni status?

James Gatannah james.gatannah at gmail.com
Thu Apr 13 04:44:34 CEST 2017


> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:18:24 -0300
> From: Trevor Bernard <trevor.bernard at gmail.com>
>
> James,
>
> I would check the generated self tests to see how to send and receive
> messages.

Do those live somewhere non-obvious?

The closest thing I've run across are in
czmq/bindings/jni/src/test/java/org/zeromq/czmq. And those all seem to
just call the C-level self-tests.

Thanks for the suggestion,
James


> Best,
> Trev
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, James Gatannah
> <james.gatannah at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been dabbling with the bindings from github and the source
>> distribution, and I'm starting to suspect that they aren't in a usable
>> state yet.
>>
>> My specific problem is that I can't figure out how to send a message.
>>
>> The closest I've managed to get is using Zframe.send(), which takes a
>> long parameter for the destination. If I pass in the Zsocket's .self
>> member, I get an error about attempting a socket operation on a
>> non-socket.
>>
>> Zsock.send() can't possibly work, since it only passes along the first
>> of the variadic arguments.
>>
>> I haven't spent much time with Zmsg, since I'm using client/server
>> socket types, but it seems to have the same problems as Zframe.
>>
>> Am I missing something obvious? Based on what I've found in the
>> mailing list archives, it looks like people expect this to work.
>>
>> I've run across a few other issues that seem like they should be
>> low-hanging fruit (the "standard" czmq socket creation methods really
>> should be static, for example), but I've never had a chance to do more
>> than glance at GSL when I was reading through the Guide the first
>> time, and I've only briefly glanced at zproject.
>>
>> And, if this is a stable API, then obviously that part couldn't be
>> changed anyway (not that that's a barrier to adding appropriate static
>> methods).
>>
>> Alternatively, I see a lot of recommendations here to just use jeromq
>> instead. Does anyone have any recommendations about the difficulty of
>> implementing CLI/SRV there as opposed to jzmq? As ugly as JNI code and
>> that build/installation process is, at least I spent some time digging
>> through that code a few years back.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:34:00 +0300
> From: Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <CAB814uHJGAp+e=SZfCzu_2CWcbr7-HPYzrNk6a5LHR7=-BvquQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Try...
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Folks;
>>
>>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is
>> this the correct forum to ask about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/f76f2c27/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:07:22 +0000
> From: "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <ACEB9BFD2A5B6C4DA05B69ECD114D1BEB89E3439 at NYEX.us.corp.aacisd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>
>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 64 bit.
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> Try...
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this the correct forum to ask about this?
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>
> 3.1.1001
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/155bdb1d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:22:11 +0000
> From: "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <ACEB9BFD2A5B6C4DA05B69ECD114D1BEB89E3461 at NYEX.us.corp.aacisd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>
>
> 3.1.1001
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Marlborough, Rick
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>
>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 64 bit.
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> Try...
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this the correct forum to ask about this?
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>
> 3.1.1001
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/4fc4d962/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:19:29 +0300
> From: Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <CAB814uGNVANnG_uKO3RhDaDT3CgBNSC1dP84gVWO31QENc4mWw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> What type of network? wifi? On same network?  What type of switch?  Router
> between?  What port are you using?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Marlborough, Rick
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
>> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
>> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>>
>>
>>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Folks;
>>
>>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm
>> transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and
>> receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node
>> 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the
>> receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and
>> the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also
>> a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>>
>>
>>
>>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat
>> 7 64 bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
>> <zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
>> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
>> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>>
>>
>>
>> Try...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Folks;
>>
>>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is
>> this the correct forum to ask about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/558a66e8/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:29:02 +0000
> From: "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <ACEB9BFD2A5B6C4DA05B69ECD114D1BEB89E3480 at NYEX.us.corp.aacisd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> It's a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is typically in the 224.15.15.X range.
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> What type of network? wifi? On same network?  What type of switch?  Router between?  What port are you using?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> 3.1.1001
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] On Behalf Of Marlborough, Rick
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>
>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 64 bit.
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> Try...
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this the correct forum to ask about this?
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/9faf0b89/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:48:55 +0300
> From: Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <CAB814uFLXKNKm1EXmdbXORYkpNNj+YU3fxL6H8Q=7AQgO=EsiA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit.  Alsilo to play with
> IGMP snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> It’s a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically
>> local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is
>> typically in the 224.15.15.X range.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Doron Somech
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM
>> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
>> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>>
>>
>>
>> What type of network? wifi? On same network?  What type of switch?  Router
>> between?  What port are you using?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Marlborough, Rick
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
>> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
>> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>>
>>
>>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Folks;
>>
>>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm
>> transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and
>> receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node
>> 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the
>> receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and
>> the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also
>> a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>>
>>
>>
>>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat
>> 7 64 bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
>> <zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
>> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
>> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>>
>>
>>
>> Try...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>>
>> Folks;
>>
>>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is
>> this the correct forum to ask about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>>
>> 3.1.1001
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/fe4ebdd0/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:50:46 +0000
> From: "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <ACEB9BFD2A5B6C4DA05B69ECD114D1BEB89E34AC at NYEX.us.corp.aacisd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Regular multi-cast works fine throughout the system.
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:49 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit.  Alsilo to play with IGMP snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> It's a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is typically in the 224.15.15.X range.
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> What type of network? wifi? On same network?  What type of switch?  Router between?  What port are you using?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> 3.1.1001
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] On Behalf Of Marlborough, Rick
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>
>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat 7 64 bit.
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> From: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Doron Somech
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
> To: ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
> Try...
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com<mailto:RMarlborough at aaccorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
> Folks;
>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is this the correct forum to ask about this?
>
> Thanx
> Rick
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org<mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=X1PaiBKS701YQFr6GMHgFDZppVsktQeear8FMPHqGOg&s=CtMxOGSA9MVXlKlmX97pcpXfEx9cc_45XjBYgTSD37U&e=>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/48767e0d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:18:06 +0300
> From: Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com>
> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
> Message-ID:
>         <CAB814uE6njBTDQi3qW-dXk_6qaAvhroD-x5z2L9==NR5RZkUZg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Can you include the code for sender and receiver?
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 20:52, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>
> Regular multi-cast works fine throughout the system.
>
>
>
> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Doron Somech
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:49 PM
>
> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
>
> I suggest to try snifing the network a liitle bit.  Alsilo to play with
> IGMP snooping. Does regular multicast on same ip works?
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 20:31, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>
> It’s a hard wired 1G network with a 3COM switch. Everything is physically
> local. We use ports that are in the 5000 to 10000 range. The ip we use is
> typically in the 224.15.15.X range.
>
>
>
> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Doron Somech
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:19 PM
> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
>
> What type of network? wifi? On same network?  What type of switch?  Router
> between?  What port are you using?
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 19:24, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>
> Correction here. We are using OpenPgm 5.2.122.
>
>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> 3.1.1001
>
> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Marlborough, Rick
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:07 PM
> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>
> Folks;
>
>                 We are attempting to use openpgm with zero mq epgm
> transport. We have a multi node system here. It looks like the send and
> receive mechanism will work in one direction. We have a test sender on node
> 1  and a test receiver on node 2. The messages flow and are received by the
> receiver. If we flip the scenario around and run the sender on node 2 and
> the receiver on node 1, there is no message flow. The same scenario is also
> a problem for pgm. tcp transport works fine in both directions.
>
>
>
>                 We are using ZeroMQ 4.2.2 and OpenPGM 5.0.0.122 on Red Hat
> 7 64 bit.
>
>
>
> Thanx
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> *From:* zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
> <zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org>] *On Behalf Of *Doron Somech
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:34 AM
> *To:* ZeroMQ development list
> *Subject:* Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm
>
>
>
> Try...
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2017 17:54, "Marlborough, Rick" <RMarlborough at aaccorp.com> wrote:
>
> Designation: Non-Export Controlled Content
>
> Folks;
>
>                 Having an issue with openpgm as used through Zero MQ. Is
> this the correct forum to ask about this?
>
>
>
> Thanx
>
> Rick
>
> 3.1.1001
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=v4Fm1rk1KaoSdzMJW2xe-dchUyLzwCna9vNffuHOg6U&s=8L7gBd4TYqShM8l7xNySJiaj98xb1ri2LxdqhM9uypg&e=>
>
> 3.1.1001
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=oYRa3JABuv7gwtuJkPimtPXAbhm2u4vcqMNlXSC7NFw&s=rafHXBXSAKNmGNgR_kR4WEPc2zAEheGR42AHWlbadD0&e=>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.zeromq.org_mailman_listinfo_zeromq-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=L6cnQwNGJqqFwLSmuJQH9Q&r=0vkEC-wQCdHs6_7-T7j4hT5guWBPAv8lluqeyT5n0ww&m=X1PaiBKS701YQFr6GMHgFDZppVsktQeear8FMPHqGOg&s=CtMxOGSA9MVXlKlmX97pcpXfEx9cc_45XjBYgTSD37U&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170411/3a9133ff/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 9
> *****************************************



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list