[zeromq-dev] Recommended libsodium version for ZeroMQ

[Luca Boccassi]

Latest stable release of sodium will work fine with both, at Kevin says we
have CI for it.

Other than CZMQ bindings, pyzmq also supports 4.2 just fine

On Oct 30, 2016 11:03, "Ahmad Zawawi" <ahmad.zawawi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I am working on https://github.com/azawawi/
> SwiftyZeroMQ and was wondering which of the scripting languages have the
> most complete and up-to-date implementation that depends on libzmq (i.e.
> 4.1 and 4.2). Since I am bundling at the moment libzmq 4.1 with libsodium,
> I was wondering whether to use the latest stable libsodium (i.e. 1.0.11) or
> another version for 4.1 and 4.2 respectively.
>
> Regards,
> Ahmad
>
> 2016-10-30 12:26 GMT+02:00 Kevin Sapper <kevinsapper88 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Ahmad,
>> we CI test against latest master thus 4.2 should be fine. Regarding the
>> language binding I recommend libzmq+czmq. There are a couple of bindings
>> for czmq as well e.g. Java, Ruby, Python...
>>
>> //Kevin
>>
>> Am 30.10.2016 9:51 vorm. schrieb "Ahmad Zawawi" <ahmad.zawawi at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What is the recommended libsodium library version for 4.1 and 4.2? Also
>>> which language binding is the most updated and complete for 4.2 so far?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ahmad
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20161030/db5b69e2/attachment.htm>