[zeromq-dev] New version of C4 (C4.2?)

Brian Knox bknox at digitalocean.com
Thu May 5 12:31:29 CEST 2016

This reminds me - I'm going to experiment with using go build tags for
controlling builds of draft contracts in goczmq.

I like the "used by real users" qualification on marking contracts as

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:53 AM Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I was writing a summary article on community building and revisited
> the C4 RFC. There were many small things that were out of date,
> speculative, or did not fit with our current best practice.
> So I've updated it here: https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/83
> Please *do* read the diffs and let me know your opinions.
> I also would like advice on whether:
> * we make a new RFC (C4.2)
> * we accept to change the existing stable RFC unilaterally
> Option 1 is more correct but means we have to update a lot of
> projects. Option 2 is lazy and breaks our process.
> -Pieter
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160505/d09e5412/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list