[zeromq-dev] Zyre clustering in malamute broker

[Greg Young]

I have all the logic for this if needed though normally you don't need all
involved just say 3 or 5 (heterogenus in larger configurations homogenous
in smaller)

Greg
On Mar 17, 2016 10:18 AM, "Pieter Hintjens" <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> Hi Arnaud,
>
> We were working on something similar, which was to elect one Malamute
> instance in a cluster as leader and then tell clients where it was. It
> is a nice first step to making hot-hot clustering.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Arnaud Loonstra <arnaud at sphaero.org>
> wrote:
> > Isn't this what we were working on during the hackathon in Brussels? It
> > indeed seemed trivial but I recall many were using higher level
> > languages so my efforts ended up in getting malamute support for higher
> > level languages. There were some people that really saw the need of
> > this. I'm wondering whether anybody continued with it after the
> > hackathon or what stopped them from doing so.
> >
> > Rg,
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > On 2016-03-16 21:40, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> >> It's not implemented. You're not the only lazy bastard around :)
> >>
> >> To make this work is non-trivial. Zyre would make it easy to find
> >> other instances. What you do then is to exchange subscriptions and
> >> then cross publish. And then the same for mailboxes and services. A
> >> federation model.
> >>
> >> I may update the whitepaper to remove all the speculative design.
> >>
> >> -Pieter
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Mario Steinhoff
> >> <steinhoff.mario at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hey everyone,
> >>>
> >>> the malamute discussion whitepaper says:
> >>>
> >>>> A peer-to-peer cluster of Malamute brokers serving a cloud, where
> >>>> each system on the cloud runs one Malamute broker. Applications
> >>>> connect to their local broker over IPC, and the brokers talk to each
> >>>> other over TCP. Malamute uses the Zyre clustering technology to
> >>>> rapidly discover and connect to new Malamute brokers.
> >>>
> >>> I am a lazy bastard and haven't checked the code yet.
> >>>
> >>> Is this functionality actually implemented?
> >>>
> >>> If not, what would I have to do?
> >>>
> >>> Mario
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160317/620c5b51/attachment.htm>