[zeromq-dev] malamute python2 bindings -- advice needed

[Aaron Sokoloski]

Hi Michel,

That's very helpful, it sounds like generating cffi bindings with cproject
is the way to go then.

Thank you,
Aaron

On 25 January 2016 at 14:02, Michel Pelletier <pelletier.michel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Aaron Sokoloski <asokoloski at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>> Maybe the right thing to do is to change zproject to also generate a CFFI
>> version of the python bindings.  Then the malamute CFFI bindings could
>> interact with pyczmq easily.  However, this is a bit more work so I wanted
>> to get people's thoughts first.
>>
>
> Hi Aaron, I wrote the pyczmq cffi bindings, and haven't looked at them in
> some time.  Sorry if they have caused you some confusion.  I always assumed
> that at some point zproject generation would replace them as hand
> maintaining the bindings is a pain as evidenced by the fact that I haven't
> done it :)  So, although I think it's more work, generating the bindings
> automatically, as you sugguest here, I do think is the right approach.
> CFFI is a bit more of a distribution pain than ctypes, but I think provides
> a nicer model, in the end it probably won't matter much to users which one
> is used.
>
> -Michel
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aaron
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160125/07aead0c/attachment.htm>