[zeromq-dev] malamute python2 bindings -- advice needed

[Michel Pelletier]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Aaron Sokoloski <asokoloski at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
>
> Maybe the right thing to do is to change zproject to also generate a CFFI
> version of the python bindings.  Then the malamute CFFI bindings could
> interact with pyczmq easily.  However, this is a bit more work so I wanted
> to get people's thoughts first.
>

Hi Aaron, I wrote the pyczmq cffi bindings, and haven't looked at them in
some time.  Sorry if they have caused you some confusion.  I always assumed
that at some point zproject generation would replace them as hand
maintaining the bindings is a pain as evidenced by the fact that I haven't
done it :)  So, although I think it's more work, generating the bindings
automatically, as you sugguest here, I do think is the right approach.
CFFI is a bit more of a distribution pain than ctypes, but I think provides
a nicer model, in the end it probably won't matter much to users which one
is used.

-Michel


>
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160125/885185a5/attachment.htm>