[zeromq-dev] State of libzmq versioning
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Wed Feb 17 12:17:50 CET 2016
We have generators of various kinds: gitdown, mkman, which zproject
uses/plugs into. The commonality is text files that turn into man
pages and then various other formats that can be sent anywhere. I
don't think we need to *standardise* so much as decide on a format, a
host, and a safe way to upload after successful CI builds. We can have
many of these.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Arnaud Loonstra <arnaud at sphaero.org> wrote:
> Perhaps we can standardise on this? Perhaps even include some
> generators for it in zproject?
> I was starting to use Sphinx for Pyre as well. Now using it for
> multiple projects. I'm not familiar with how it works with other
> languages but for Python it's great.
>
> On 2016-02-17 10:39, Doron Somech wrote:
>> Take a look at readthedocs.org [9], it is what NetMQ is using and
>> completely automated. You manage the docs in the git repository.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com
>> [10]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, the tools we use to build the online docs are old and creaky,
>>> and
>>> date from long before we had neat CI automation. Meaning, we update
>>> the api site manually.
>>>
>>> Im doing that now. I think its time we look at pushing this
>>> directly
>>> to github pages, from Travis.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Mario Steinhoff
>>> <steinhoff.mario at gmail.com [1]> wrote:
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > I am a bit confused about the available information on libzmq
>>> versions.
>>> >
>>> > The page at api.zeromq.org [2] says that we have:
>>> >
>>> > - 4.2 (master)
>>> > - 4.1 (rc)
>>> > - 4.0 (stable)
>>> > - 3.2 (stable)
>>> >
>>> > On the download page 4.0 is missing:
>>> >
>>> > - a version-less master which "should be stable almost all the
>>> time" (4.2?)
>>> > - 4.1.4 ("stable")
>>> > - 3.2.5 ("legacy stable")
>>> >
>>> > In libzmq, the NEWS file on master seems to be outdated (last
>>> update
>>> > in 2014). The doc folder in libzmq seems to be maintained but not
>>> in
>>> > sync with api.zeromq.org [3] (I checked today and some changes
>>> from the
>>> > last commit in that folder are not present on the site).
>>> >
>>> > There are also maintained stabilization forks as per C4.1 for
>>> libzmq,
>>> > e.g. zeromq4-x (which contains 4.0?), 4-1, and 3-x (which
>>> contains
>>> > 3.2?).
>>> >
>>> > And then there is this article: http://hintjens.com/blog:85 [4]
>>> which
>>> > suggests in a very compelling way that software versions suck and
>>> to
>>> > ditch them altogether (yes I agree) but I cant find those SBOMs
>>> > anywhere so I assume that experiment did not went very far.
>>> >
>>> > With all this, whats the current status on libzmq versioning?
>>> >
>>> > Am I understanding right that:
>>> >
>>> > - The libzmq repository is always the latest and greatest, and
>>> 4.2
>>> > looks like the last version Ill ever need™, its always stable
>>> and
>>> > follows the raw-draft-stable-deprecated process so its also
>>> always
>>> > backwards compatible.
>>> >
>>> > - Stable releases are maintained for 3.2, 4.0, and 4.1 and
>>> sometimes
>>> > bugfixes get backported from 4.2.
>>> >
>>> > - Release notes are only maintained for stable releases?
>>> >
>>> > Is the outdated API site a bug or a feature? I am currently using
>>> the
>>> > text files in doc/ but I like to look at the fancy ZMQ logo when
>>> I
>>> > browse the API reference :-)
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Mario
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org [5]
>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev [6]
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org [7]
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev [8]
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] mailto:steinhoff.mario at gmail.com
>> [2] http://api.zeromq.org
>> [3] http://api.zeromq.org
>> [4] http://hintjens.com/blog:85
>> [5] mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> [6] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> [7] mailto:zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> [8] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> [9] http://readthedocs.org
>> [10] mailto:ph at imatix.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list