[zeromq-dev] Erlang implementation of ZMTP 3.1

Andriy Drozdyuk drozzy at gmail.com
Sat Aug 13 20:52:54 CEST 2016


Agreed on the name. Will do.

Oh phew, I thought you were beeing serious about the skype interview there
for a second. :-)
Is the project "owned" by anyone at that point? What's to prevent me being
removed from the "admins" (just hypothetical question)?

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 at 14:11 Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> You need to pay us a fee in small-unit BTC (to be discussed) and then
> pass through the initiation ceremony, which involves firstly the short
> 6-hour Skype interview about your understanding of queuing theory as
> it intersects with Conways' Law, then a longer Q&A session with the
> Elders of the Zero, as we like to call ourselves.
>
> Just kidding. It's simply a place on github, that lets you claim the
> project is "official" and lets us boast we have more "official"
> projects. No change in the project organization or admin. We have our
> recommendations for license and process yet you're not forced to
> follow these.
>
> See http://zeromq.org/docs:organization
>
> BTW I really would suggest a rename to make it clearer it's not a
> binding but a complete implementation. Either using "zmtp" in the
> name, or something MQ, is the fashion.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <drozzy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Peter.
> > What did you mean by "bring the project into the ZeroMQ organization on
> > github"?
> >
> > Would I still be able to oversee the development process? In particular,
> > accepting patches, nominating contributors etc...
> > How does that work?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 12:39 Andriy Drozdyuk <drozzy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Pieter. I've read all those things when I learned zmq :) I agree
> >> with what you're suggesting, but that model doesn't really work for me
> at
> >> this time. I was thinking of trying it this way for a year to see what
> >> happens in the future.
> >>
> >> Elliot, thanks for that distinction. I've never thought about that but
> it
> >> makes perfect sense.
> >> Regarding curve, that would be amazing. This was going to be my next
> goal.
> >> You can contact me at drozzy at choven.ca so we can discuss it further.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 5:10 a.m. Elliot Crosby-McCullough,
> >> <elliot.cm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Andriy,
> >>>
> >>> Glad to see a full BEAM implementation.
> >>>
> >>> I've been working on something similar in Elixir
> >>> (https://github.com/SmartCasual/elixir-zeromq) but since you've gotten
> >>> further in Erlang I'll take a look at contributing Curve support to
> yours
> >>> instead, since all I really wanted was native BEAM instead of a
> binding to
> >>> the C library given the dangers and/or inefficiencies of doing so.
> >>>
> >>> I'll have to look more closely into the licensing you've gone for to
> see
> >>> whether it's compatible with my needs.
> >>>
> >>> Small note, but what you've got there is an implementation not a
> binding
> >>> (which is a good thing).  It would be a binding if it used e.g. the C
> >>> library to do the work.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Elliot
> >>>
> >>> On 28 June 2016 at 18:09, Andriy Drozdyuk <drozzy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> At Pieter's suggestion, I am putting this here:
> >>>> https://github.com/chovencorp/erlangzmq
> >>>>
> >>>> Native erlang 18 implementation of ZMTP 3.1 (including resource
> >>>> property), but without any security.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hopefully it will be useful to people. I know I'll use it myself -
> since
> >>>> all (native) erlang bindings are out of date.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a six month young project, so this is NOT performance or
> >>>> otherwise tested at all, and I would appreciate any feedback (just
> take a
> >>>> second to file an issue).
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you,
> >>>> --Andriy Drozdyuk
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160813/ddcb6761/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list