[zeromq-dev] UDP without PGM
tldr1969 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 15:43:33 CEST 2016
Oh thats great! I'll check out a copy of the development tree to play
around with it.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:
> Zeromq now have UDP transport, which you can use with the radio-dish
> socket types.
> No docs yet so take a look at the following test:
> Both multicast and unicast should work.
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Ben Kloosterman <bklooste at gmail.com>
>> Just leave the UDP .. I use UDP as a separate channel and its so
>> different that it should always be considered different eg no guarantee ,
>> no packet > 64K / MTU etc etc Forcing it to the sane structure is likely
>> to be a bad idea.
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, TL;DR <tldr1969 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, I just wanted to kick this conversation again.
>>> Does anyone have any pointers to patches or experimental versions that
>>> provide UDP datagram transport without PGM? Just plain UDP for
>>> I have migrated pretty much all services in a system over to ZeroMQ.
>>> But there is a use case where I use UDP today, and haven't been able to do
>>> so. I'm thinking there must be others (esp in finance) who are in the same
>>> PGM is a non-starter because auto-magical but late delivery is worse for
>>> us than no delivery in this use case. These particular applications have
>>> more complex behavior when they have missed something, and there is a
>>> favored application level mechanism for detection of missed messages and
>>> Thanks for any advice,
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the zeromq-dev