[zeromq-dev] UDP without PGM
Ben Kloosterman
bklooste at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 05:26:18 CEST 2016
Just leave the UDP .. I use UDP as a separate channel and its so
different that it should always be considered different eg no guarantee ,
no packet > 64K / MTU etc etc Forcing it to the sane structure is likely
to be a bad idea.
Ben
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, TL;DR <tldr1969 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I just wanted to kick this conversation again.
>
> Does anyone have any pointers to patches or experimental versions that
> provide UDP datagram transport without PGM? Just plain UDP for
> unicast/multicast.
>
> I have migrated pretty much all services in a system over to ZeroMQ. But
> there is a use case where I use UDP today, and haven't been able to do so.
> I'm thinking there must be others (esp in finance) who are in the same boat.
>
> PGM is a non-starter because auto-magical but late delivery is worse for
> us than no delivery in this use case. These particular applications have
> more complex behavior when they have missed something, and there is a
> favored application level mechanism for detection of missed messages and
> recovery.
>
> Thanks for any advice,
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160426/aa773392/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list