[zeromq-dev] CZMQ "stable" release versioning
opedroso at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 11:57:31 CEST 2016
What is the process of marking an individual method as draft?
What should one do to have that effect?
Sent from my iPad. Regularly foiled by autocorrect. But duck it..
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 04:51, Pieter Hintjens <pieterh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, retiring the deprecated APIs and bumping the major version should go together.
>> On 24 Apr 2016 13:37, "Luca Boccassi" <luca.boccassi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 00:09 +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> > we can mark individual methods and classes as draft, even within a
>> > stable release.
>> > On 23 Apr 2016 21:10, "Brian Knox" <bknox at digitalocean.com> wrote:
>> > When we cut another "stable" release of CZMQ to keep packagers
>> > happy, I'm wondering what version we'll use - specifically
>> > around a stable release that include radar/dish,
>> > scatter/gather and client/server.
>> > I want to start a new version of the rsyslog input and output
>> > plugins that only support the new thread safe sockets. To
>> > avoid ifdef hell in the current plugins I'll probably just
>> > make new instances - so if the next release is 4, I'll name
>> > them omczmq4 / imczmq4 etc.
>> > Cheers,
>> > Brian
>> <puts nosy Debian Maintainer hat on>
>> Given since the last release some public APIs have changed in an
>> incompatible way (eg: zmsg_encode/decode signatures), there should be a
>> major version bump (besides an ABI bump), and I'll have to upload a new
>> source/-dev package.
>> A while ago we also talked about the possibility of retiring the
>> deprecated APIs. Is that still on the plate?
>> Kind regards,
>> Luca Boccassi
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the zeromq-dev