[zeromq-dev] Moving list to Google groups?

[Kyle Kelley]

I'm in favor of Google groups, relative to the alternatives.

On Thursday, April 14, 2016, Greg Young <gregoryyoung1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Google groups is a mediocre solution given all the alternatives but
> its also quite commonly used so most people are willing to deal with
> its warts. The history of the group would be important to bring over
> if possible (I do not know of an api for bringing it over).
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to raise this question for discussion. The problem is that
> > zeromq-dev is running on an iMatix server, and I'd like to remove
> > iMatix infrastructure from our community, over time. It's a matter of
> > long term sustainability.
> >
> > (Apart from the list, iMatix also hosts downloads.zeromq.org which we
> > can start to move to Github release attachments IMO.)
> >
> > Anyhow, re. lists, let's weigh pros and cons of Google groups versus
> > other options. I'll make the decision based on this thread and other
> > factors.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Pieter
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Studying for the Turing test
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>


-- 
Kyle Kelley (@rgbkrk <https://twitter.com/rgbkrk>; lambdaops.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20160414/c11c661d/attachment.htm>