[zeromq-dev] Unicast UDP load balancing with 0MQ?

[Peter Krey]

NORM is even better than UDP anyway imo

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> You could use either of the NORM or PGM transports.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Matthieu Labour
> <matthieu.labour at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for your response. Can ZeroMQ + pubsub + TIPC could be used in
> > place of multicast over UDP ?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> There's no UDP transport in libzmq. There have been efforts at making
> >> this... never made it into the master though.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Matthieu Labour
> >> <matthieu.labour at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hello
> >> > Does 0MQ allow do to unicast UDP load balancing? Does 0MQ offer a
> >> > pattern
> >> > for that?
> >> > I have many clients publishing many small UDP messages and servers
> >> > listening
> >> > for the UDP messages and doing heavy processing.
> >> > Thank you for your help.
> >> > -matthieu
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20151022/f0ab75ad/attachment.htm>