[zeromq-dev] Is 0mq security tutorial (blog:49) out of date?

Brian T. Carcich briantcarcich at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 13:25:08 CEST 2015


Huh?  I see examples/security/*.c, still using zauth_new (zauth_v2.c) and
zsocket_new instead of zactor_new and zsock_new, but the tests in zauth
give a good idea of what to do.

Thanks, I should have checked the obvious!

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> Yes, it's out of date, sorry. There are up to date examples in CZMQ
> examples/security.
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Brian T. Carcich
> <briantcarcich at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It looks to me like the
> >
> >   Using ZeroMQ Security (part 2)
> >
> > blog entry i.e.
> >
> >   http://hintjens.com/blog:49
> >
> > is out of date, as it uses the declared obsolete
> >
> >   zauth_new(ctx);
> >
> > call from zauth_v2.c to instantiate a new zauth structure, and The New
> Way
> > is something like
> >
> >   zactor_new(zauth,NULL);
> >
> > Is that correct?
> >
> > I am coming at this trying to get something done on a deadline, so
> > understanding everything is not my first priority.  Not that failure to
> plan
> > on my part constitutes an emergency on anyone else's, nor am I asking
> anyone
> > to do my homework, but if the answer is a simple yes then I'd appreciate
> > knowing it so I can take the correct fork in the road the first time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian Carcich
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20151017/459ea80c/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list