[zeromq-dev] New ZeroMQ Organization Project

[Brian Knox]

Doron - I think we can get away with not supporting multi part.  We're
mainly interested in PUB / SUB and CLIENT / SERVER support.  With CLIENT /
SERVER being able to stand in for ROUTER / DEALER and not requiring multi
part messages - I think we can ignore multi part for what we're doing.

I've got the initial signature handshake working over TCP here today as
well as the version exchange but unfortunately I'm not going to have much
time to work on it for the rest of this week.  I'm going to go ahead and
submit a PR with that I have so far today.

Cheers,
Brian

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:

> Brain I will love to help and improve my golang on the way.
>
> Small tip, if you don't need multi-parts it will make your implementation
> much easier.
> If you do need, using the "commit" solution of libzmq is very complicated,
> try to unified all the parts into one data structure and enqueue it into a
> channel (you will loose some performance but implementation will be much
> easier and thread safe).
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>
>> The name is :)
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Brian Knox <bknox at digitalocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Pieter - yup!  I've looked at the libzmtp code before - it + the zmtp
>> rfc
>> > combined are a good reference.
>> >
>> > We're going to keep the name "gogozmq" for now mainly because we like
>> saying
>> > "go go zmq!" a lot.  It may not be the best name, but it has the
>> important
>> > property of making me smile whenever I say it. ;)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Brian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Go go zmq! :-)
>> >>
>> >> This is a great idea. I'm going to suggest modestly that "gomq" could
>> >> work better as a name. "gogozmq" looks like a binding name.
>> >>
>> >> FWIW we started on a small C library (libzmtp) and what we made was a
>> >> DEALER socket. This is immediately useful, and could be a good
>> >> starting point.
>> >>
>> >> -Pieter
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Brian Knox <bknox at digitalocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Luna and I have been talking about implementing a subset of ZeroMQ in
>> >> > pure
>> >> > go to complement goczmq for people who don't want C dependencies.  It
>> >> > would
>> >> > solve a great set of problems for both of us and we feel would be
>> useful
>> >> > to
>> >> > others as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > We wanted to give a heads up that we're going to create a "gogozmq"
>> >> > project
>> >> > in the ZeroMQ organization.  We plan to follow the C4.1 dev process.
>> >> > First
>> >> > PR will be submitted later today.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers!
>> >> > Brian & Luna
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20151010/f186129f/attachment.htm>