[zeromq-dev] Malamute broker project

[Doron Somech]

> I did it in actors and then moved it back into the main server as it
> was complexity for nothing (at that stage). I'd rather design against
> real use than against theory.

Don't you worry about the matching performance which will happen on the
main thread? Also a usage I can see is to use exact matching (string
comparison) over regular expression (I usually use exact matching), this is
way I think the plugin model fits the service as well.

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So I went over the code, really liked it. Very simple.
>
> Thanks. I like the plugin model, especially neat using CZMQ actors.
>
> > I have a question regarding services, for each stream you are using a
> > dedicate thread (actors) and one thread for managing mailboxes. However
> (if
> > I understood correctly) for services you are doing the processing inside
> the
> > server thread, why didn't you use an actor for each service or actor to
> > manage all services? I think the matching of services can be expensive
> and
> > block the main thread.
>
> I did it in actors and then moved it back into the main server as it
> was complexity for nothing (at that stage). I'd rather design against
> real use than against theory.
>
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150301/8a17d760/attachment.htm>