[zeromq-dev] Moving back cppzmq into libzmq

Kenneth Adam Miller kennethadammiller at gmail.com
Sat Jun 27 02:46:24 CEST 2015


Done!

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, after having done some searching, it turns out that the
> ocaml-zmq binding had fallen behind, which relies off of cppzmq (oddly
> enough, ocaml bindings only go to C via ctypes, not C++... :/)
>
> In any case, I'm sorry I tied things up, I have been working on this mad
> sprint for pushing software today, and I'm even still working on that. I
> have edits to like 4-7 open source projects sitting around with my trying
> to get everything pristine before shipping. Sorry! I'm shipping ocaml-zmq
> changes at this moment.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
> kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Crap, I'm really sorry! Let me ship that right now. I was thinking about
>> this not too long ago and wondering where my commit went, because I know I
>> made edits...
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Kenneth, is your patch ready?
>>> Also, do you mean that the current cppzmq head doesn't work correctly
>>> with current libzmq head ? (as in we shouldn't merge now).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller
>>> <kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Oh, I have something to merge in to allow the newest version to work
>>> well
>>> > together, let me do a merge request before you execute this please.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Sounds good to me. It never developed as a separate project, did it.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > Hello,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I've stumbled upon this issue
>>> https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq/issues/48
>>> >> > .
>>> >> > Basically the cppzmq binding (header only, 1 file) is not versioned
>>> >> > and not packaged on some distros.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > People wants this file to be tagged to ease versionning, which make
>>> >> > sense.
>>> >> > However, wouldn't it be even better if this was part of libzmq. I
>>> >> > *believe* this was the case a long time ago, but the choice was made
>>> >> > to split them.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I don't know the reason, but maybe it's worth considering merging
>>> them
>>> >> > back. After all, zmq.hpp is a very thin wrapper and I don't think
>>> it'd
>>> >> > be too annoying to maintain as part of libzmq.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > What are your thoughts on this?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> >> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150626/ef1227a4/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list