[zeromq-dev] Moving back cppzmq into libzmq

[Kenneth Adam Miller]

Actually, after having done some searching, it turns out that the ocaml-zmq
binding had fallen behind, which relies off of cppzmq (oddly enough, ocaml
bindings only go to C via ctypes, not C++... :/)

In any case, I'm sorry I tied things up, I have been working on this mad
sprint for pushing software today, and I'm even still working on that. I
have edits to like 4-7 open source projects sitting around with my trying
to get everything pristine before shipping. Sorry! I'm shipping ocaml-zmq
changes at this moment.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:

> Crap, I'm really sorry! Let me ship that right now. I was thinking about
> this not too long ago and wondering where my commit went, because I know I
> made edits...
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Kenneth, is your patch ready?
>> Also, do you mean that the current cppzmq head doesn't work correctly
>> with current libzmq head ? (as in we shouldn't merge now).
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller
>> <kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Oh, I have something to merge in to allow the newest version to work
>> well
>> > together, let me do a merge request before you execute this please.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Sounds good to me. It never developed as a separate project, did it.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I've stumbled upon this issue
>> https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq/issues/48
>> >> > .
>> >> > Basically the cppzmq binding (header only, 1 file) is not versioned
>> >> > and not packaged on some distros.
>> >> >
>> >> > People wants this file to be tagged to ease versionning, which make
>> >> > sense.
>> >> > However, wouldn't it be even better if this was part of libzmq. I
>> >> > *believe* this was the case a long time ago, but the choice was made
>> >> > to split them.
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't know the reason, but maybe it's worth considering merging
>> them
>> >> > back. After all, zmq.hpp is a very thin wrapper and I don't think
>> it'd
>> >> > be too annoying to maintain as part of libzmq.
>> >> >
>> >> > What are your thoughts on this?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150626/9ab192e1/attachment.htm>