[zeromq-dev] Implementation question

[Kenneth Adam Miller]

Excellent! I was pretty sure that ipc worked over some kind of OS provided
construct.

The thing is, here where I work, people previously have been manually
constructing some systems programming based constructs to work by
communicating over a pipe. So I'm wondering if their manual mechanisms can
be supplanted by ZMQ. The problem is, I have some shady areas in terms of
implementation and rules because it's a high assurance area and because
making a technical decision is hard since there's a custom secure/hardened
driver that all code has to work in context of.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Leonard Michelet <
leonard.michelet at openwide.fr> wrote:

> I use IPC socket on linux and it use named pipe (the address socket must
> be something like "ipc://path/to/the/pipe").
> I hope it answer the question...
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> > De: "Kenneth Adam Miller" <kennethadammiller at gmail.com>
> > À: "ZeroMQ development list" <zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org>
> > Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Juillet 2015 18:42:06
> > Objet: [zeromq-dev] Implementation question
> >
> >
> >
> > Does inproc or ipc use fifo pipes in ferrying the data between
> > sockets in the underlying library?
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150724/12c2511a/attachment.htm>