[zeromq-dev] Should I use socket option ZMQ_TCP_ACCEPT_FILTER in ZeroMQ 4.0?

[Pieter Hintjens]

Bindings should probably just ignore deprecated options unless there's
an explicit reason to support them.


On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Arnaud Kapp <kapp.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd say write that it is deprecated.
> One should use the ZAP API as it's more flexible and allows for more
> configuration.
>
> As soon as the ZAP API is available, encourage your user to use it
> over other means of filtering / securing connection.
>
> At least that's my opinion.
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Peter Kleiweg <pkleiweg at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>
>> The API doc version 4.1 for setsockopt option
>> ZMQ_TCP_ACCEPT_FILTER says this option is deprecated, and you
>> should use the ZAP API instead.
>>
>> The API doc version 4.0 doesn't say this, but the ZAP API is
>> already available.
>>
>> Writing bindings for ZeroMQ 4, should I write in the docs that
>> this option is deprecated since 4.1, or should I just write that
>> it is deprecated?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Peter Kleiweg
>> http://pkleiweg.home.xs4all.nl/
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev