[zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

MinRK benjaminrk at gmail.com
Sun Feb 8 00:53:10 CET 2015


On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:28 PM, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There may be reasons this would be super gross and horrible, but it's an
> > idea, anyway.
>
> It didn't solve any identifiable problem, and forced every proxy loop
> to become two loops. If multipart is nasty because it makes the
> concept of "message" more complex, then this was doubly horrid.
>

I guess the problems I identified that it solves weren't really problems,
then.


>
> Separating the routing stack from the message would probably be neat
> if the result was an atomic message, and proper semantics for using
> that routing stack (a "reply" method, for instance).
>
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150207/3bb92a94/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list