[zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Sat Feb 7 09:02:35 CET 2015

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:28 PM, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:

> There may be reasons this would be super gross and horrible, but it's an
> idea, anyway.

It didn't solve any identifiable problem, and forced every proxy loop
to become two loops. If multipart is nasty because it makes the
concept of "message" more complex, then this was doubly horrid.

Separating the routing stack from the message would probably be neat
if the result was an atomic message, and proper semantics for using
that routing stack (a "reply" method, for instance).


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list