[zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

Doron Somech somdoron at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 09:43:34 CET 2015

Regarding multihope on ZProto we can have a stack of routing id (that will
be serialized to the wire) and a method called reply and a method call
forward. What do you think?
On Feb 6, 2015 10:09 AM, "Pieter Hintjens" <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:41 PM, AJ Lewis <AJ.Lewis at quantum.com> wrote:
> > Is the plan really to drop multi-hop routing?
> I did want, and am glad to get, stories from people using multihop routing.
> I think the situation here is that we're using the multihop
> request-reply pattern, it depends on multipart, and that's fine. It's
> a standard, it's implemented, and it's stable.
> So we can focus on new patterns (like client/server) quite separately,
> and if we make threadsafe sockets, perhaps use them only in these new
> cases.
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150206/93a87cc2/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list