[zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Wed Feb 4 00:50:40 CET 2015

Ironically, in my testing of high message rate), allowing multipart
creates significant costs. Multipart is just one way of getting
zero-copy, and even then only works on writing, not reading.

For high performance brokers like Malamute I'd *really* like to be
moving blobs around instead of lists of blobs.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Gregg Irwin <gregg at pointillistic.com> wrote:
> M> Perhaps it is because I spend my days in a higher level language
> M> like Python, but zproto is not an attractive option.
> Same here. I will read in detail about it shortly, but it may not make
> it into my toolbox as a multipart replacement. Multipart looked very
> cool when I found 0MQ, but I've ended up not using it much. I'm not
> doing high performance stuff though. Simplicity and ease of use are
> tops on my list.
> -- Gregg
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list