[zeromq-dev] Malamute and old zmq api

[Joe McIlvain]

Kenneth,

It may not be necessary to share the same context.  The most common reason
to require using the same context is inproc communication - if you can use
ipc instead, that may be your best solution.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm, I've read the class to be thorough, and it seems that there certainly
> isn't any way to just replace the singleton that I've written. Any other
> work-arounds??
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
> kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah ok. Thanks, I saw that function, but it was marked deprecated, and it
>> seems that there have been several stabs at context management in the apis
>> just wanted to be sure. Previously, I wrote my own implementation of a
>> singleton; I will replace the singleton getter with a call to zsys_init(),
>> but I still need to return a zmq::context_t; how to I properly box that
>> type up to make it look to callers to be and function the same without
>> having to refactor the whole system?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Joe McIlvain <joe.eli.mac at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Kenneth,
>>>
>>> I'd think the only thing to worry about is the zeromq contexts.  Not
>>> sure if you're trying to use them together to interoperate or just have
>>> them compiled together, but CZMQ uses a single global context, which you
>>> can access to share by calling zsys_init() (safe to call multiple times,
>>> always returns the same global context).
>>>
>>> Many applications use the low-level ZMQ API when the CZMQ high-level
>>> wrappers don't cover their use case - one oft-used example is advanced uses
>>> of zmq_poll.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller <
>>> kennethadammiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Suppose we wanted to make use of malamute in a large project that had
>>>> been using zmq.hpp for a long time. Malamute uses czmq, and for good
>>>> reason. It's much better. What's the best way to go about ensuring that the
>>>> two apis can be used safely?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20150410/1ba830e1/attachment.htm>