[zeromq-dev] ZMQException: Errno 48 : Address already in use
Trevor Bernard
trevor.bernard at gmail.com
Wed Sep 10 23:58:20 CEST 2014
JeroMQ actually has higher throughput than JZMQ. There is a heavy cost
when crossing the boundary between java and native JNI code. I would
suggest people start with JeroMQ unless they need a feature that it
doesn't support like inproc, pgm and currently security. It's far
simpler to get up and running.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Stephen Riesenberg
<stephen.riesenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> It certainly will, but using JeroMQ is not a choice made typically for
> performance reasons in the first place, right?
>
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 10:55 AM, 曾纪川 <zengjichuan at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Bernard, thanks for your answer. But I wonder that using "tcp" or "ipc" may
> affect the transfer rate.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zeng Jichuan
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:05:06 -0300
>> From: trevor.bernard at gmail.com
>> To: zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQException: Errno 48 : Address already in use
>>
>> INPROC is not properly supported on JeroMQ. It translate the bind to
>> "tcp://127.0.0.1:port". If you want INPROC, use JZMQ.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:22 AM, 曾纪川 <zengjichuan at outlook.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the answer. If I use client.bind("ipc://yo:15545"); server
>> > will
>> > receive msg as expected. If not use bind, server cannot receive msg, but
>> > when I use client.bind("inproc://yo:15545"); the Errno 48 will raise. I
>> > need
>> > to set both sides' bind address, cause there are other DEALERs would
>> > connect
>> > to them.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Zeng Jichuan
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:46:51 -0600
>> > From: optionguy71 at gmail.com
>> > To: zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQException: Errno 48 : Address already in
>> > use
>> >
>> >
>> > One side should bind, and the other should use connect.
>> >
>> > On Sep 9, 2014 11:39 PM, "曾纪川" <zengjichuan at outlook.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I just start to learn ZMQ in java(jeromq-0.3.4, Ubuntu 14.10, java-1.8),
>> > I
>> > want to design a N:N connection network which suppose to be the model
>> > ROUTER-ROUTER
>> > The problem is ROUTER will raise "Errno 48 : Address already in use"
>> > when I
>> > set both Routes' bind address to be "inproc", it will
>> > be all right in both non-inproc addresses, or one side non-inproc addr.
>> > So
>> > how can I set both sides inproc addr and keep connection.
>> >
>> > code list :
>> >
>> > ZMQ.Socket server = ctx.createSocket(ZMQ.ROUTER);
>> > server.setIdentity(connectEndpoint.getBytes());
>> > server.bind(bindEndpoint);
>> > System.out.printf ("I: service is ready at %s\n", bindEndpoint);
>> >
>> > ZMQ.Poller poller = new ZMQ.Poller(1);
>> > poller.register(new ZMQ.PollItem(server, ZMQ.Poller.POLLIN));
>> >
>> > while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
>> > ZMsg request = null;
>> > poller.poll();
>> > if(poller.pollin(0)){
>> > request = ZMsg.recvMsg(server);
>> > }
>> > if (request == null)
>> > break; // Interrupted
>> >
>> > System.out.println("Server received: "+request);
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> > ZMQ.Socket client = ctx.createSocket(ZMQ.ROUTER);
>> > client.setIdentity("client1".getBytes());
>> > client.bind("inproc://yo:15545");
>> > //client.bind("ipc://yo:15545"); // it works
>> > client.connect(bindEndpoint); //errno
>> >
>> > ZMsg request = new ZMsg();
>> > request.add("");
>> > request.add("Client Message");
>> > request.push(connectEndpoint);
>> > request.send(client);
>> >
>> > exception:
>> > Exception in thread "main" org.zeromq.ZMQException: Errno 48 :
>> > Address already in use
>> > at org.zeromq.ZMQ$Socket.mayRaise(ZMQ.java:1344)
>> > at org.zeromq.ZMQ$Socket.connect(ZMQ.java:1157)
>> > at TestId.main(TestId.java:54)
>> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> > at
>> >
>> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> > at
>> >
>> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
>> > at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:134)
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Zeng Jichuan
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list