[zeromq-dev] zsock_monitor?

[Pieter Hintjens]

Hmm, I think you can attach just one monitor to libzmq, period. What
you can certainly do then is re-send monitor events to other parts of
an application.

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:50 AM, cbisegni <cbisegni at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is possible to have only one monitor for more socket? When I have studied
> how to use monitor socket all example and test that i have done, have worked
> using one monitor for one socket. Image if I have a process that need to
> manage a lot of connection and check when client goes away and I have to
> dispose the socket for clean resource. I need a socket for every client
> because every connection manage different data(so I can't use the same
> socket with different endpoint).
> Using one monitor socket on a separate thread for every client socket
> connection(this is example that I have found), is not the best situation on
> an high number of client. How can zmq be used to manage this situation in
> the best way?
> Thanks in advance?
> Best regards
> Claudio
>
> il 18/ott/2014 00:26, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> ha scritto:
>
> It's called zmonitor, and works as an actor.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Papp Aron <aphex999 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using CZMQ 3.0.0 (libzmq 4.1.0), and trying to leave the deprecated
>> zsocket, and move to zsock. Previously, I used zmonitor to check if the
>> TCP
>> connection was established successfully, but I can not find it's
>> substitue,
>> zsock_monitor.
>>
>> Is there another way to check connection state?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Aron
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev