[zeromq-dev] jeromq raw-sockets

[Benjamin]

Hi Trevor,

thanks for your work on JeroMQ. Are raw sockets on the road map? I would
like to use JeroMQ as a backend for web-requests like Mongrel.

Regards,
Benjamin

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bernard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Robin,
>
> I think a previous build might have been overwritten. See:
>
> - https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq3-x/tree/v0.3.3
> - https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq/tree/v0.3.3
>
> I would run a diff between to two to see if there are any significant
> differences. I would use the latest stable build which is  v0.3.4.
>
> Regards,
>
> Trevor
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Robin Newton
> <robin.newton at linguamatics.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using JeroMQ 0.3.3 in a product, and I've just noticed that there's a
> > difference between the jar I've been using up until now, and the one
> that's
> > currently downloadable (from
> >
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/org/zeromq/jeromq/0.3.3/
> ).
> >
> > Many of the class files are different, but that could mean anything, and
> I'm
> > not about to start poking around that in detail. However, there are other
> > differences suggesting the builds were done with different source: the
> > org.jeromq package was present in the older jar, but not the most recent;
> > the class org.zeromq.ZMQ$Event is new. Moreover, the SCM details
> recorded in
> > their respective pom.xml files are different. (See attached diff.)
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea what the significance of this is?
> >
> > My guess is that I should just use the more recent jar, and that
> provided I
> > wasn't depending on classes from org.jeromq (which I wasn't) then it
> should
> > all be fine. I'm mainly asking because I don't like mysteries. (That
> said,
> > the thought that the content of release builds might change is a bit
> > unsettling.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20141010/e00751ae/attachment.htm>