[zeromq-dev] zeromq, rewritten in Rust

Fantix King fantix.king at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 03:55:47 CET 2014


Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is one if
possible.

BR,
Fantix
--
http://about.me/fantix


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <lists at chuckremes.com> wrote:

> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an attempt at
> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language Rust. If
> you haven't heard of Rust, it is a new language under development by the
> good folks at Mozilla. It's original designer has said that he has learned
> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the years
> that he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner
> language. Rust is his attempt at such a feat.
>
> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many popular
> languages.
>
>         * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax
>
>         * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP, safe
> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers)
>
>         * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the expense
> of imperative forms
>
>         * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better syntax and a
> more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable defaults, etc)
>
> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The language is
> still evolving, so it's a bit of a moving target. It's at release 0.9 with
> a 1.0 slated for later this year, but they've already slipped on delivering
> a 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again.
>
> Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to get
> things started. However, I'd like to start a thread here to discuss
> "lessons learned" from the existing codebase. We already have a great
> write-up from Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq)
> here:
>
> http://250bpm.com/blog:4
>
> http://250bpm.com/blog:8
>
> I'm hoping that others who have read through the source have additional
> insights that they'd like to share. For instance, I have seen comments that
> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped around a
> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it's new to you). People also seem to
> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already eliminated
> this... it still exists but is hidden by the library).
>
> Any other insights?
>
> cr
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140304/24894829/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list