[zeromq-dev] JZMQ stable/production ready build

Benjamin Cordes benjamin.l.cordes at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 11:54:57 CEST 2014


With regards to multicast: is PGM planned for JeroMQ? Would this use the
OpenPGM Java implementation? OpenPGM points to
https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm , which was last updated a year ago.


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Petr Postulka <ppostulka at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Trevor,
>
> thank you for the info about the performance ... good to know.
> Unfortunately the multicast is quite important for us too.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Petr
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bernard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > thank you for the recommendation of JeroMQ - we were using it so far
>> and it
>> > is definitely a very nice project I have to say. But for our upcoming
>> > project we need the best performance we can get and probably a multicast
>> > too. These are the reasons why we are "forced" to use JZMQ ...
>>
>> From my performance tests, JeroMQ has higher throughput and lower
>> latency than JZMQ. This has to do with the fact that crossing the JNI
>> boundary and working with byte arrays are expensive. I agree with
>> Benjamin, if you don't need security, domain sockets or multicat,
>> there is no reason to be to choose JZMQ over JeroMQ. Performance use
>> to be another one but it's no longer the case.
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140626/be0471de/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list