[zeromq-dev] JZMQ stable/production ready build

Petr Postulka ppostulka at gmail.com
Wed Jun 25 18:53:55 CEST 2014

Hi Trevor,

thank you for the info about the performance ... good to know.
Unfortunately the multicast is quite important for us too.

Kind regards,


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bernard at gmail.com>

> > thank you for the recommendation of JeroMQ - we were using it so far and
> it
> > is definitely a very nice project I have to say. But for our upcoming
> > project we need the best performance we can get and probably a multicast
> > too. These are the reasons why we are "forced" to use JZMQ ...
> From my performance tests, JeroMQ has higher throughput and lower
> latency than JZMQ. This has to do with the fact that crossing the JNI
> boundary and working with byte arrays are expensive. I agree with
> Benjamin, if you don't need security, domain sockets or multicat,
> there is no reason to be to choose JZMQ over JeroMQ. Performance use
> to be another one but it's no longer the case.
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140625/15431dcb/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list