[zeromq-dev] Can zmq_pollitem_t contain an item with a NULL socket ?
Laurent Alebarde
l.alebarde at free.fr
Thu Jan 30 11:20:09 CET 2014
IMHO, it is a bad design of zmq_pollitem_t. It should not have one
attribute for socket and another one for file-descriptor with this
unrobust behaviour to use the second one when the first one is NULL, but
one for the type (socket or fd), and a union containing one or the other.
Implemented:
typedef struct
{
void *socket;
#if defined _WIN32
SOCKET fd;
#else
int fd;
#endif
short events;
short revents;
} zmq_pollitem_t;
Should be:
typedef struct
{
int type; // ZMQ_SOCKET | ZMQ_FD
union {
void *socket;
#if defined _WIN32
SOCKET fd;
#else
int fd;
#endif
} dev;
short events;
short revents;
} zmq_pollitem_t;
But it would break the ABI to change it, isn't it ?
Le 30/01/2014 10:56, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
> In fact, it is in src/zmq.cpp / "int zmq_poll (zmq_pollitem_t *items_,
> int nitems_, long timeout_)"
>
> When the socket is NULL, zmq_poll takes the second attribute of the
> zmq_pollitem_t structure which is a file descriptor. So, I cannot do
> anything here, as "socket == NULL and fd == 0" is legitimate.
>
> Conclusion: I have to deal myself with the complexity of not having
> NULL sockets in my zmq_pollitem_t array.
>
> Le 30/01/2014 09:23, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
>> Thanks Pieter.
>>
>> Personnaly, I would prefer "ignore", in order to build zmq_pollitem_t
>> arrays with more ease, when they are built by the application itself,
>> and not hardwritten in the code.
>>
>> Any objection ?
>>
>> Le 29/01/2014 20:20, Pieter Hintjens a écrit :
>>> Undefined, by the man page. It should probably assert in such a case.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Laurent Alebarde<l.alebarde at free.fr> wrote:
>>>> Hi Devs,
>>>>
>>>> What is the zmq_poll behaviour when the zmq_pollitem_t array contains an
>>>> item with a NULL socket ? ignored, undefined, error ?
>>>>
>>>> If it is in src/poll.cpp / "void zmq::poll_t::loop ()" / "for
>>>> (pollset_t::size_type i = 0; i != pollset.size (); i++)", it seems there is
>>>> no NULL test with a continue.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Laurent
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140130/9a149691/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list