[zeromq-dev] [zmqpp] Indentation style?

[Ben Gray]

Personally I prefer, and have so far used, tabs for the same reason Pieter
gives actually. However as the libzmq uses four spaces I fine with
switching over.
On 25 Jan 2014 00:05, "Pieter Hintjens" <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> For libzmq and czmq, the indentation style is 4 spaces. Tabs look
> inconsistent across editors.
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk>
> wrote:
> > OS X and Linux uses the same compilers: GCC and Clang, but different
> > linkers.
> >
> >
> > On 24 January 2014 15:08, Lindley French <lindleyf at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In fact, OSX seems to require a much different build. -soname doesn't
> seem
> >> to be supported, -f isn't a valid flag to ar, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Lindley French <lindleyf at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Update: I don't know why it seemed to be working before, but I've
> >>> confirmed that OSX and linux handle variadic templates the same way.
> The key
> >>> is there can't be any conversion if you want the non-template overload
> to be
> >>> called. Therefore I'm solving the problem by adding reinterpret_casts
> to the
> >>> operator<<s.
> >>>
> >>> In the process of investigating this, I've discovered that OSX does not
> >>> support the -rdynamic gcc option (or the equivalent
> -Wl,-export-dynamic).
> >>> The zmqpp Makefile will need to be updated to avoid passing this
> option on
> >>> OSX.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Lindley French <lindleyf at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the defined indentation style for zmqpp? I see a lot of it
> uses
> >>>> tabs, but a few places it uses four spaces. I want to make sure
> things stay
> >>>> consistent. My editor is configured for 4 space indents; I prefer
> that since
> >>>> it tends to give a more uniform look across editors.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, my variadic template pull request was tested on linux, but now
> >>>> what I try to build on OSX I'm getting compile errors. I think it's
> because
> >>>> the variadic add() function is being preferred to the (void*,int)
> overload
> >>>> used by the insertion operators for some reason. I'm not sure why
> this would
> >>>> be different between platforms.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140125/ae62017f/attachment.htm>