[zeromq-dev] Router socket to force peer disconnect

Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 17:03:10 CET 2014


I'd like to. But it doesn't seem to be possible with Java or CLR at the
moment. And we don't have time/budget to invest in support right now.

Thanks for answer.


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> If you don't trust your peers you should probably be using ZeroMQ 4.x
> and security. Then you will only see authenticated peers.
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov
> <dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > continue my little evaluation of zeromq and wanted to ask next question:
> is
> > it possible to force disconnect of client from router side? (e.g.
> disconnect
> > req or dealer).
> >
> > If it is not possible are those clients who connected to router socket
> > consume resources? A lot? Even if no messages send/received from them?
> >
> > We are in environment where we don't trust peers until they complete
> > handshake with router socket.
> > And would like to disconnect them if handshake failed. (i know we can
> simply
> > ignore them and keep connected).
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140109/7b332b06/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list