[zeromq-dev] clone pattern Q: ok to replace by XPUB?

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Tue Feb 18 13:48:18 CET 2014

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Michael Haberler <mail17 at mah.priv.at> wrote:

> The clone pattern is close to what I need for state replication. There's one simplification I plan to use (assuming clone was written before XPUB was around):
> One socket less to manage, same effect. Are these patterns equivalent or am I overlooking something?

It's very plausible, anyhow :-)  Worth trying. It'd make the Clone
pattern much simpler.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list