[zeromq-dev] Which C++ binding

Sean Lynch lynchseanm at gmail.com
Mon Feb 17 17:12:09 CET 2014


Thanks. 

I also just saw a thread describing how zmqpp was moved into
http://www.github.com/zeromq and is now owned by the zeromq
organization. So I assume all further work will be done there and
benjamg/zmqpp is dead.

On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:44 -0500, Lindley French wrote:
> I recommend zmqpp. It works more like you'd expect a C++ library to
> work. cppzmq is a more "C with classes" approach.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Sean Lynch <lynchseanm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>         Hello,
>         
>         I'm new to zeromq and have a question about the C++ bindings.
>         
>         I see that there are two different implementations. There is
>         cppzmq
>         which looks like just a thin wrapper around the C library, and
>         there is
>         zmqpp which is more involved and looks more like a typical C++
>         library
>         rather than a thin wrapper.
>         
>         I'd like to know if there is a 'standard' or 'recommended'
>         binding and
>         if so, which one?
>         
>         Also, related to zmqpp, another bit of confusion comes from
>         the fact
>         that the link to zmqpp is to Ben Gray's zmqpp repository, but
>         this is
>         actually a fork of zeromq/zmqpp. All of the most recent work
>         has been
>         done on zeromq/zmqpp, so I'm unsure why the link would point
>         to
>         benjamg/zmqpp and not zeromq/zmqpp.
>         
>         Thanks.
>         
>         -Sean
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         zeromq-dev mailing list
>         zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>         http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev





More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list