[zeromq-dev] Why I might want to use JeroMQ if I'm completely fine with JZMQ?

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Tue Oct 1 23:00:28 CEST 2013

You may want to add this to the FAQ or somewhere on the wiki:

- the two stacks are comparable in performance but it depends on
message size and frequency
- the two stacks are identical at the API and protocol level, and
fully interchangeable
- JeroMQ matches ZeroMQ stable 3.2 whereas JZMQ may soon track release 4.0
- JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java version
- JeroMQ does not yet support ZMTP v3.0 and its security mechanisms,
so no encryption
- JeroMQ needs no JNI, so is easier to install especially on Java
devices and Android

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Artem Vysochyn
<artem.vysochyn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, the question in subj.
> Q1: What are compeling reasons one should know so that they could turn
> him into JeroMQ?
> Q2: What's true about JeroMQ:
> - better supported?
> - community more responsive?
> - community has quicker turnaround (in terms of features)?
> - battle tested (has prod deployments)?
> Thanks
> -artemv
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list