[zeromq-dev] JeroMQ

crocket crockabiscuit at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 22:52:08 CEST 2013


According to my previous tests, jzmq and JeroMQ are on par in terms of
performance.


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Lun, Nicholas <nlun at ea.com> wrote:

> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I wanted to ask your opinion on JeroMQ as an alternative to the Java
> binding you have available. Performance-wise it is my understanding that
> the C library will be as fast or faster, but I find the maintenance easier
> since JeroMQ is easier to upgrade. What are your opinions? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Nick****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131002/9b93e5e4/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list