[zeromq-dev] a general debugging issue in IPC communications.

Andrew Hume andrew at research.att.com
Fri Nov 8 09:07:04 CET 2013


indeed. and you can check the protocols themselves with things like Spin/Promela.

On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:00 AM, crocket wrote:

> As long as formal protocols obviate the need to debug over boundaries of multiple applications, that would work.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:05 PM, crocket <crockabiscuit at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I came to a conclusion that monolithic applications suck and modular
> > applications suck, too.
> >
> > How do we devise an approach that doesn't suck?
> 
> Anything complex requires some planning. What seems to work best is
> decentralization based on formal protocols, so that each piece can be
> built and tested independently.
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


-----------------------
Andrew Hume
949-707-1964 (VO and best)
732-420-0907 (NJ)
andrew at research.att.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131108/18b79c1b/attachment.html>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list